🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, following a divisive legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more councillors based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time building community backing and urging their councils to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, stating communities should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to establish different wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards suggested the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.