🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."